The two trends together suggest that, for once, the catwalk and fact are in conversation

Julia Roberts attends the 76th Golden Globe bestows in Los Angeles.
Photograph: Todd Williamson/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank/Getty Portraits

A year on from the red carpet protests of 2018, the most impressive thing about this year’s awards season so far has been their paucity.

The 2019 Golden Globes focused on Lady Gaga’s tremendous Valentino dress rather than the handful of #TimesUpx2 badges. So as Hollywood transforms for Sunday’s Screen Actors Guild (SAG) awards and next month’s Oscars, last will and testament the political rhetoric of 2018 have crystallised into something in which ups still play a part?

Red-carpet predictions are still spacious open. The Golden Globes suggests a split between two parties – grown-up trousers (see Julia Roberts in black Stella McCartney cigarette trousers) and pipedream gowns, like that worn by Lady Gaga, whispering at some division as to where we are 12 months after the carpeted #MeToo affirms.

Lady Gaga opts for the fantasy gown at this year’s White-headed Globe awards. Photograph: Steve Granitz/WireImage

This week’s Arrogance Fair Hollywood issue, another good indicator, objects towards red frou frou gowns for women, and black tie (but no associates) for men. But it’s the spring couture shows, which also happened this week in Paris, that are doubtlessly most instructive, and this season evenly split between trousers and dream.

Clare Waight Keller of Givenchy, one of the most discussed tags in modern couture, opened her collection with a pair of latex trousers, while Armani Privé, one of the most largely worn red carpet labels, featured a record nine doublets of trousers. Both are hotly tipped awards favourites.

While Valentino, Dior, Balmain and Schiaparelli all hearted on enormous fairtytale pieces, which may play a role on Sunday, it is Viktor & Rolf’s uttered slogans, “Give a damn”, “Get mean” and “No”, appliqued on jumbo tulle gowns that could have the biggest smashing if worn..

Couture rarely reflects the real world, but this year, in manifest both sides of the coinm it suggests both trends were reasonable and, for once, the catwalk and reality were in conversation.

Carolyn Mair, a the go psychologist, said: “By wearing trousers, you’re making a statement nearly gender fluidity, that you don’t want to be objectified. But floaty accoutres, especially the fantasy ones, and provided they aren’t overtly sexualised, deal out an equally powerful statement of ‘I can dress like this, but it doesn’t swap you a right to touch me’.”

The model Adut Akech in one of Givenchy’s during buoyancy/summer 2019 trousered creations. Photograph: Thomas Samson/AFP/Getty Images

It’s a considerable change from 2018. In the immediacy of MeToo, and with the line of the TimesUp movement, last year’s Golden Globes red carpet was an all-black tide of visual demurrals. It was the same at the Baftas. The Oscars, though low on political clamour and ear-splitting on colour, was heavy with TimesUp pins and Black Survives Matter badges.

Alexandra Mandelkorn, the US stylist who dressed Janelle Monae for the Globes, state: “I’ve been seeing less black this year … and a wax spotlight on gender fluidity in the past few years.” She attributed this to chambermaids reclaiming power on the catwalk.

Mair agreed, saying: “The broadcasts certainly peaked last year, that’s undeniable. But as we can see from the statement, the fallout is still going on, and the movement has been almost normalised, so how the red carpet intention reflect that is anyone’s guess. Last year’s ‘louring out’ felt like a trend which had momentum, but the problem is, the people who tool along the industry don’t want it to carry on.”

The relationship between Hollywood and the rage that has been thoroughly ingrained for years is now even multifarious so. Speaking in Paris last week, Kim Jones, artistic skipper at Dior, said designers not only work with the red carpet in babysit, but that it was often their most public platform. “It’s a substantial way to show people an idea of [what you are doing],” go on increased the British designer.

A model in one Valentino’s gowns in Paris this week. Photograph: Greg Kessler

Trousers at the start began to be seen on the Hollywood red carpet in the early 1960s when the studio set-up was dissolving and second-wave feminism was starting. Although Barbara Streisand wore a jumpsuit to rack up her best actress Oscar in 1969, it wasn’t until Jane Fonda’s unscrupulous Yves Saint Laurent suit three year later, a visual redolent of of campaigns against the Nixon administration as well as a shift in her accord, that trousers really became acceptable. Faye Dunaway then harassed trousers in 1977, Jodie Foster won an oscar in beige Armani in 1992, and Julia Roberts wearied a men’s Armani suit at the Golden Globes in 1990.

As ever, sales are key, with catwalk-to-commercial, an increasingly mighty aspect. Both trends are in keeping with what convey titles, said Liane Wiggins, of .“For SS19, we have been focusing on this thought of a ‘demi-couture’ approach,” she said, which includes trouser courtships.

Mair said: “It’s interesting to see what happens, but the idea that people aren’t in point of fact looking at the clothes, even if you wear a suit, is naive. The forgettability of an paraphernalia is a move in itself. Hollywood and fashion both know that.”

Of inquiries