The Beholder

Anna Wintour

While Condé Nast has said the Vogue editor-in-chief will not be stepping down, turmoil has been mounting as wage-earners past and present speak out

Anna Wintour in Athens, Greece, on 27 November 2019.
Photograph: Alkis Konstantinidis/Reuters

For decades she has countenanced astride the fashion industry, micromanaging the look and content of US Vogue, marshalling a significant part of the global fashion activity to her worldview, and presiding over an annual gala at which, for $25,000 a head, paying guests and favored courtiers mounted the lavishly carpeted withdraws of Metropolitan Museum of Art to symbolically kiss the ring.
But for Anna Wintour this has been her annus horribilis. New York style week has been written off, the Met Gala has been cancelled, magazine advertising revenues are plummeting and there are scarcely any frocks to pump full of lead since the coronavirus barged its way into the European fashion shows in February.
Yet now a crisis is breaking over Wintour, Fashionableness and the Condé Nast publishing empire: the reckoning with racism in America, triggered by the killing of George Floyd by a pallid police officer in Minneapolis, that has now spread to all aspects of American life, from publishing to academia to sports.
Decisive week, Condé Nast, the publisher of Vogue and other lifestyle glossy publications, was hit by charged criticism for failures to fortifying diversity in both the workplace and in terms of the content it typically publishes. With two senior editors leaving over folk insensitivity, and former employees describing Vogue workplace as fearful, accounts of discrimination in the New York office of Condé Nast glut out.
Speculation mounted last week that Wintour’s position as Vogue’s editor-in-chief, as well as the publisher’s US artistic president and “global content adviser”, could be becoming untenable after several employees spoke out about racial favouritism in the workplace and pay inequities.
On Friday, Condé Nast’s top executive convened a town hall meeting of employees to say that Wintour pass on not be stepping down.
“There are very few people in the world who can have the influence on change and culture, as it relates to the activities that our task has, than Anna,” Condé Nast’s CEO, Roger Lynch, said. “The reason she is here is because she can help influence the transmute that we need to make, and I know she is committed to it.”
Mounting turmoil at the publisher in recent days has included the resignation of Adam Rapoport, the rewriter in chief of Bon Appétit magazine who reported to Wintour, over Instagram photos of Rapoport and his wife in a Latino version of brownface at a Halloween confederation in 2013. A public apology said staff members conceded that the magazine “continued to tokenize” the people of color that it did fee.
That was quickly followed by the exit of Condé Nast’s head of lifestyle video programming, Matt Duckor, after staffers requested that Condé Nast failed to feature people of color in videos and did not pay them for appearances. A number of Duckor’s tweets with racist and homophobic remark ons were recirculated online.
Wintour has attempted to quell the tide of protest, admitting to making mistakes and publishing apparatus that has been intolerant, as well as not doing enough to promote black staff and designers at the magazine. In a memo sent earlier this month, Wintour defended to staff for “publishing images or stories that have been hurtful or intolerant” and admitted there were too few staff members of color.
“I want to say plainly that I know Vogue has not found enough ways to elevate and give space to bad-tempered editors, writers, photographers, designers and other creators. We have made mistakes too, publishing images or stories that father been hurtful or intolerant. I take full responsibility for those mistakes.”
But the letter was met with scorn by an African American old member of Vogue’s staff. Former colleague and ally André Leon Talley shared his views on Wintour’s email in a podcast appraisal.
“[Wintour’s] statement came out of the space of white privilege,” Talley said. “I want to say one thing: Dame Anna Wintour is a colonial generalized, she’s a colonial dame, she comes from British, she’s part of an environment of colonialism. She is entitled and I do not think she will ever let anything get in the way of her pure privilege.”
Others have followed suit with damning portrayals of the treatment of minorities within the company.
Quondam staffer Shelby Ivey Christie wrote on Twitter: “My time at Vogue, at Condé Nast, was the most challenging + depressed time of my career – The bullying + testing from white counterparts, the completely thankless work, the terrible base pay + the racism was strenuous.”
Wintour’s position may be further undermined by the appointment of Samira Nasr, formerly of Vanity Fair, as the first female awful editor of rival Harper’s Bazaar. “As the proud daughter of a Lebanese father and Trinidadian mother, my worldview is expansive and is moored in the belief that representation matters,” said Nasr in a video message.
British Vogue also has a minority rewrite man, Edward Enninful, who has done much to steer the magazine away from predominantly featuring white subject papers. In the current issue, Enninful commissioned a series of powerful portraits by Jamie Hawkesworth of women, often minorities, and time working in healthcare and other essential services on the frontlines of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The turmoil at Condé Nast comes as the journal industry, as well as publishing in general, has been slammed by coronavirus-related advertising revenue drops of about 45%. In brand-new years, the publisher has cut or reduced publication of several titles and sublet six of its 23 floors at 1 World Trade Center.
Wintour settle upon be hoping Condé Nast’s 10-member board of directors, headed by Lynch and made up by members of the Newhouse family and two except for directors, including former Gucci CEO Domenico De Sole, continue to stand behind her, as they have for decades.
But some non-participants are not so sure.
“Fashion comes and goes,” one former glossy magazine editor, who declined to be identified, told the Guardian. “Ammunition publishing and fashion were in deep trouble before all this. Will Anna get washed away in that surge? Probably.”


Anna Wintour

The Observer



Condé Nast

US provoke and publishing



Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Interest via Email

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Pinterest

Share on WhatsApp

Share on Hermes

Reuse this content